QUESTION TIME ??????

This pile of twaddle from Ole Blubber Lips appeared in the Oldham evening Chronicle Fri 17th Dec The OEC had questioned why Labour had included him on the list of candidates for the forthcoming by-election. A reasonable question one may assume, given that his fingerprints were all over the operation which resulted in them losing their sitting MP in the constituency.

 

INTEGRITY IS NOT IN QUESTION

What the slimy toad seems to forget is that he was, alongside Joseph Fitzpatrick and Steven Green, responsible for promulgating and publishing the lies and innuendo in the various Labour rags, which lead to the downfall of Woolas. The actions of these three, in publishing personal attacks on Elwyn Watkins are what the whole court case hinged on. And he talks to us of integrity?

He states that in Court Judgement Para 125: His evidence, that the costs incurred by the Petitioner's election team was in the region of £200,000, was "unchallenged"

Also Para 125 The Court says "It is unclear from his statement how this very large sum was reached."

Para 126 says "One element in Mr Battye's estimate was evidence which the Respondent's election team had received from a former Liberal Democrat volunteer, Mrs McGladdery"

Para 131 The Court says: "We concluded that she was an unreliable witness."This woman made several unsubstantiated claims against the Petitioner and the Lib-Dems. The court said: " We were not persuaded that there was substance in any of these complaints and concluded that they demonstrated, unhappily, a preparedness on her part to make unfounded complaints......"
 "The Respondent, (Woolas), agreed when cross-examined that facts alleged in election addresses should be checked and should be backed up by RELIABLE evidence. We consider that on any objective assessment the allegations made by Mrs McGladdery were not reliable."

Para 131 The Court says: "We concluded that she was an unreliable witness."

Does that mean the evidence was discredited and unreliable???
Is this not the evidence upon which Battye based his accusations ???

This woman has been used as a stooge by  the Labour party  and Battye in particular. At one stage he was even drafting letters of complaint for her.
He claims that the "innuendo" in the editorial in the OEC was that his evidence was 'either discredited or unreliable.'

No blubberychops your evidence wasn't 'either discredited or unreliable.' It was discredited AND unreliable.
As for 'speculation about my integrity.' We are not speculating. We have you sussed. Much as we thought Woolas was a complete tosser, he deserved better than the three deceitful, scheming, lying pieces of shit: Battye, Fitzpatrick and Green.

THE TIME IS NOW!...... SAY NO !!